Evaluation of Item Candidates: The PROMIS Qualitative Item Review

By Darren A. DeWalt, Nan E. Rothrock, S. Yount, Arthur A. Stone. Medical Care, 2007

744 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f45fa937dcc3cde105071d11cf68cefa067b772c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Psychiatry and Mental health

S. Reise

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Item Banks for Measuring Emotional Distress From the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger (2011, background): “Final construction of items involved careful consideration of time frames, response sets, verb tense, grammatical structure, and demands on literacy (see DeWalt et al., 2007).”
Initial Adult Health Item Banks and First Wave Testing of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS™) Network: 2005–2008 (2010, neutral): “Six phases of item development were documented: identification of existing items, item classification and selection, item review and revision, focus group input on domain coverage, cognitive interviews with individual items, and final revision before field testing [2].”
Psychometric Evaluation and Calibration of Health-Related Quality of Life Item Banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (2007, methodology): “CFA was selected over an exploratory analysis as the first step because each potential pool of items was carefully selected by experts to represent a dominant PRO construct through an exhaustive literature review and feedback from patients through focus groups and cognitive testing.(7) Because of th”
Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. (2010, methodology): “Although absolute Q3 values larger than 0.30 are often used to identify local dependence,66 the nature of items banks, such as sleep disturbance and SRI, is expected to produce more locally dependent pairs and clusters67 of items than are other types of item banks, such as cognitive tests.”
Development of A Promis Item Bank to Measure Pain Interference (2010, methodology): “The National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) initiative [10,11,20,41,42,48] targeted four pain subdomains: interference, quality, behaviors and intensity.”