The evolution of Australia's natural resource management programs: Towards improved targeting and evaluation of investments

242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The potential for collaborative agri-environment schemes in England: Can a well-designed collaborative approach address farmers’ concerns with current schemes? (2012, background): “One of the principal achievements of landcare in Australia, as well as in examples from the Philippines, is its ability to positively alter attitudes by bringing farmers together and providing a space for interaction and normative shifts amongst peers (Cramb, 2006; Hajkowicz, 2009; Lockie, 2006; Wil”
Payments for ecosystem services: A review and comparison of developing and industrialized countries (2013, background): “Approximately 15% of all published articles within the PES literature refer explicitly to the EU, US or Australia; most of these papers report on agri-environmental programs (AEP).”
Improving biodiversity monitoring (2012, background): “Australian examples include very large investments like the Natural HeritageTrust (ANAO 1997, 2008; Hajkowicz 2009) and the Threatened Species Network Community grants, but they are paralleled by programmes within many large biodiversity conservation organizations around the world (Muir 2010).”