Genome-Wide Detection of Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variations of a Single Human Cell
By Chenghang Zong, Sijia Lu, Alec R. Chapman, Xiaohui S. Xie. Science, 2012
1,027 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Single-Cell Sequencing With the rapid progress in sequencing technologies, single-cell sequencing is now possible, promising insight into how cell-to-cell heterogeneity affects biological behavior. Achieving adequate genome coverage remains a challenge because single-cell sequencing relies on genome amplification that is prone to sequence bias. Zong et al. (p. 1622) report a new amplification method: multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles that allowed 93% genome coverage for a human cell. This coverage facilitated accurate detection of point mutations and copy number variations. Lu et al. (p. 1627) used the method to sequence 99 sperm cells from a single individual. Mapping the meiotic crossovers revealed a nonrandom distribution with a reduced recombination rate near transcription start sites. A whole-genome amplification method with reduced bias compares a single cell with its descendants. Kindred cells can have different genomes because of dynamic changes in DNA. Single-cell sequencing is needed to characterize these genomic differences but has been hindered by whole-genome amplification bias, resulting in low genome coverage. Here, we report on a new amplification method—multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycles (MALBAC)—that offers high uniformity across the genome. Sequencing MALBAC-amplified DNA achieves 93% genome coverage ≥1x for a single human cell at 25x mean sequencing depth. We detected digitized copy-number variations (CNVs) of a single cancer cell. By sequencing three kindred cells, we were able to identify individual single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), with no false positives detected. We directly measured the genome-wide mutation rate of a cancer cell line and found that purine-pyrimidine exchanges occurred unusually frequently among the newly acquired SNVs.
Subfields: Cancer Research, Genetics, Molecular Biology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3d379bbcc277d9fbcfd06fd466d2f42054acd31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cancer Research
- John C. Marioni
- Sarah A. Teichmann
- Valentine Svensson
- Dominic Grün
- Alexander van Oudenaarden
- Fabian J Theis
- Malte D. Luecken
- Rahul Satija
In Genetics
- John C. Marioni
- J. Gregory Caporaso
- Ruth E. Ley
- Dominic Grün
- Rob Knight
- Sarah A. Teichmann
- Valentine Svensson
- Alexander van Oudenaarden
In Molecular Biology
- Rob Knight
- John C. Marioni
- J. Gregory Caporaso
- Ruth E. Ley
- William Walters
- Sarah A. Teichmann
- Omry Koren
- Valentine Svensson
Citations in the corpus
- Conducting a Microbiome Study (2014, methodology): “Moreover, both of these methods are suitable for amplification from single cells (Lasken, 2007; Zong et al., 2012).”
- Lessons from the cancer genome. (2013, neutral): “Moreover, new protocols that yield more uniform and accurate whole-genome amplification have been developed (Zong et al., 2012).”
- The technology and biology of single-cell RNA sequencing. (2015, background): “scRNA-seq combined with DNA sequencing (Dey et al., 2015; Macaulay et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2012a; Zong et al., 2012) or other lineaging methods promises to reveal the transcriptomic phenotype of cells together with their developmental history through inference of shared somatic mutations in the D”
- Design and Analysis of Single-Cell Sequencing Experiments. (2015, methodology): “Another study employed a hiddenMarkov model for CNV detection, with the hidden states corresponding to the local copy number (Zong et al., 2012).”