Experimental components for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems
By Pia Borlund. J. Documentation, 2000
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Information Systems and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3c1c43a17bad0d0892f170a91ce247224c3517c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- Diane Kelly
- Peter Ingwersen
- Kalervo Järvelin
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Enrico Bertini
- Nicholas J. Belkin
- Jaana Kekäläinen
- Jeremy Boy
In Information Systems and Management
- Diane Kelly
- Jean-Daniel Fekete
- Nicholas J. Belkin
- Peter Ingwersen
- Jaana Kekäläinen
- Kalervo Järvelin
- Yuelin Li
- Donna K. Harman
Citations in the corpus
- Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users (2009, background): “Borlund [32, 34] has contributed much to IIR evaluation with”
- The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (2005, background): “This interdependence of seeking, information need development and relevance assessment was previously put forward by Ingwersen and Borlund (1996) but in a less stringent way.”
- Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques (2002, methodology): “The relative relevance and ranked half-life measures [Borlund and Ingwersen 1998; Borlund 2000] were developed for interactive IR evaluation.”
- A Principled Way of Assessing Visualization Literacy (2014, background): “The following task scenario [6] was given: The year is 2813.”
- A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking (2008, background): “Natural work tasks emerge from real life; simulated work tasks are designed for research, for example, Borlund’s simulated work task situations (2000); requests for information refers to the tasks which assign search topics or requirements representing information need, for example, the tasks assign”