The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context

By Peter Ingwersen, Kalervo Järvelin. The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval, 2005

1,148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, History, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/98703fa5d72a6aa9c19a39ef00e7eeb7c108f5f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

In History

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation (2009, background): “To be more specific, researchers ( Ingwersen & Jarvelin, 2005; Saracevic, 1997; Xie, 2008) have identified interface, computational mechanisms, and information objects as the main components of IR systems that influence the outcomes of IR searching.”
LifeLogging: Personal Big Data (2014, positive): “(2013); Price (2010); Jacquemard et al. (2013) introduce these issues. For basic forms of lifelogging, such as quantified-self analysis using small personal sensors such as the FitBit, then there is no privacy concern as the monitoring occurs inwards (i.e. towards the individual); however when using”
Some(what) grand challenges for information retrieval (2008, background): “(p. 18) Most recently, Ingwersen and Järvelin (2005), in their book, The Turn, have proposed a program for integrating studies of users, their tasks, goals, information problems and behaviors with research in IR techniques.”
The dark side of information: overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies (2009, background): “[60] P. Ingwersen and K. Jarvelin, The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context (Springer, Munich, Germany, 2005).. [61] D. Nicholas, P. Huntington, P. Williams and T. Dobrowski, Re-appraising information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: bouncers, checkers, return”
Methods for Evaluating Interactive Information Retrieval Systems with Users (2009, methodology): “Ingwersen and Järvelin [139] present a general discussion of methods used in information seeking and retrieval research.”
Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance (2007, methodology): “A few reconciliatory authors (such as Ingwersen & Järvelin, 2005, discussed later) tried to resolve the differences.”
Exploratory Search: Beyond the Query-Response Paradigm (2009, background): “This is increasingly true of the lookupbased model as a basis for information-seeking research, where humans and their search context have emerged as important participants in the search process (Bates, 1989; Ingwersen and Järvelin, 2005).”
The Notion of Relevance in Information Science: Everybody knows what relevance is. But, what is it really? (2016, background): “Starting from a cognitive (thus user) viewpoint, Ingwersen and Järvelin (2005) produced a massive volume outlining the integration of approaches in information seeking and IR in context.”
A faceted approach to conceptualizing tasks in information seeking (2008, methodology): “Taking these two types of search task, Kim and Allen (2000) and Kim (2001) examined the influence of cognitive style, online database search experience, and task types on the user’s search behavior on the Web.”
Information Retrieval Evaluation (2011, neutral): “Other references for user studies are the recent book by Ingwersen and Järvelin [98] which presents frameworks for evaluation of various information seeking tasks, and the special issue of Information Processing and Management [28] on evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems.”