Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control

By Tobias Egner. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2007

601 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/03cbb90b348551ae0bd6c530b0f236d162b0d188

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In General Decision Sciences

Citations in the corpus

Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes (2011, background): “Avast library of experimental designs illustrate precisely the types of steps that can be taken to eliminate the influence of cooccurring phenomena, and there is little reason why similar approaches could not be adopted to examine differences between language groups (Akcay & Hazeltine, 2007, 2008; F”
Single-trial multisensory memories affect later auditory and visual object discrimination. (2015, unknown): “…of the congruency effect (i.e. faster reaction times (RTs) and higher accuracy upon congruent auditory-visual trials as compared to incongruent trials) is highly context-dependent (Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004; Egner, 2007; Lindsay & Jacoby, 1994; Sarmiento, Shore, Milliken, & Sanabria, 2012).”
Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review (2018, background): “The typical behavioral sequential effect observed in these paradigms is that the effect of conflict in the current trial is reduced (improved performance) if the previous trial was a conflict trial (Duthoo, Abrahamse, Braem, Boehler, & Notebaert, 2014; Egner, 2007; Gratton, Coles, & Donchin, 1992).”
Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function (2007, background): “Recent research has demonstrated ( pace Mayr, Awh, & Laurey, 2003) that such sequence effects cannot be attributed entirely to perceptual or motor priming (Notebaert & Verguts, 2007; Ullsperger, Bylsma, & Botvinick, 2005) or to expectancy effects (Egner, 2007).”
Conflicts as Aversive Signals for Control Adaptation (2015, background): “…control adaptation has been subject to tremendous research in the last decade, the basic finding being that in classical interference tasks, interference caused by response conflict in one trial is substantially reduced, if not eliminated, in the subsequent trial (for a review, see Egner, 2007).”
Between Persistence and Flexibility: The Yin and Yang of Action Control (2015, background): “Note that this can be described as an inhibitory process: every gain for the not require any independent inhibitor—inhibition is the necessary consequence of combining competition with capacity limitations, as in every neural system.”