Delay Discounting and Intelligence: A Meta-Analysis.

By Noah A. Shamosh, Jeremy R. Gray. 2008

407 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f37ff36d9992d47f91ec6f98d395c024e651e435

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Niklas Potrafke
2. Adriana da Matta
3. F. Gonçalves
4. Jonathan W. Schooler
5. L. Bizarro

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Jonathan W. Schooler
2. J. Smallwood
3. Niklas Potrafke
4. Adriana da Matta
5. F. Gonçalves
6. L. Bizarro
7. Zachary C. Irving
8. Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna

In General Decision Sciences

1. Niklas Potrafke
2. Adriana da Matta
3. F. Gonçalves
4. Jonathan W. Schooler
5. L. Bizarro

Citations in the corpus

• The science of mind wandering: empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. (2015, background): “Superior delayed gratification is known to be predictive of positive attributes such as greater intelligence (Shamosh & Gray 2008).”
• Delay discounting: concepts and measures (2012, background): “These are important measures (Shamosh & Gray, 2008) used sometimes as synonyms of impulsiveness (Bickel & Marsch, 2001; Rachlin, Brown, & Cross, 2000), a construct that has been strongly related to several other measures (Mitchell, 1999).”
• Intelligence and corruption (2012, background): “I propose that there is less corruption in societies with high-IQ populations becausemore intelligent people have longer time horizons, a common finding in psychology and economics (Shamosh and Gray, 2008; Jones ∗ Tel.”