An osseointegrated human-machine gateway for long-term sensory feedback and motor control of artificial limbs
By M. Ortiz-Catalán, B. Håkansson, R. Brånemark. Science Translational Medicine, 2014
445 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f3484250ce13778d1b932e0b0edac74444eee95a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- E. Todorov
- Zhe Xu
- Vikash Kumar
- Sergey Levine
- Pieter Abbeel
- Abhishek Gupta
- Aravind Rajeswaran
- Weiwei Li
In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- Zhe Xu
- E. Todorov
- Sergey Levine
- Vikash Kumar
- Daniel A. Braun
- Pedro A. Ortega
- Mark L. Latash
- Pieter Abbeel
Citations in the corpus
- Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users (2016, background): “Moreover, they require a long training phase and suffer from signal degradation due to sweating or inadequate positioning of the socket.”
- Biomimetic Intraneural Sensory Feedback Enhances Sensation Naturalness, Tactile Sensitivity, and Manual Dexterity in a Bidirectional Prosthesis. (2018, unknown): “Implantable peripheral nerve interfaces can be reliably used to provide sensory feedback to upper limb amputees (Graczyk et al., 2016; Horch et al., 2011; Ortiz-Catalan et al., 2014; Raspopovic et al., 2014, 2017; Tan et al., 2014, 2015).”
- Design of a highly biomimetic anthropomorphic robotic hand towards artificial limb regeneration (2016, methodology): “…(EMG) signals collected from the residual limb or targeted muscle reinnervation regions [4]; or using intrusive methods like directly implanting microelectrodes at the motor cortex of the brain [5] or cuffing peripheral nerves with miniaturized electrodes to collect control inputs [6].”