Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs.

By H. C. Gerhardt. 2001

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2fea0fb542d1b2d18669017ec33d8d7ea67150b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. K. Wells
2. U. Candolin
3. J. Schwartz

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. K. Wells
2. U. Candolin
3. J. Schwartz
4. E. Hebets
5. G. Uetz
6. Daniel T. Blumstein
7. D. Papaj
8. N. E. Munoz

In Global and Planetary Change

1. K. Wells
2. U. Candolin
3. J. Schwartz

Citations in the corpus

• The Behavioral Ecology of Anuran Communication (2007, background): “Nevertheless, males become disinihibited if the spectral characteristics of the vocalization are altered by 10% during playback tests, or if the source of the calls is moved (Bee and Gerhardt 2001).”
• The use of multiple cues in mate choice (2003, background): “In treefrogs Hyla versicolor and Hyla chrysoscelis, work by Gerhardt and co-workers (reviewed in Gerhardt, 2001) demonstrated that females use different cues for species recognition and mate assessment; call pulse rate is used for species recognition whereas call duration, which reflects male…”