Framing Persuasive Appeals: Episodic and Thematic Framing, Emotional Response, and Policy Opinion
By K. Gross. 2008
518 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2e757ef238258925fcee388bd2adf1d3fbd38de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Dominique S. Wirz
- Sophie Lecheler
- Andreas Schuck
- Claes H. de Vreese
- L. Aarøe
- Eran Halperin
- Patrick Weber
- Katharina Sommer
In Social Psychology
- Andreas Schuck
- L. Aarøe
- Eran Halperin
- Patrick Weber
- Sophie Lecheler
- Katharina Sommer
- Rinaldo Kühne
- Linda Bos
In Sociology and Political Science
- Dominique S. Wirz
- Patrick Weber
- Katharina Sommer
- Rinaldo Kühne
- Sophie Lecheler
- Claes H. de Vreese
- Andreas Schuck
- Linda Bos
Citations in the corpus
- Dealing with feelings: Positive and negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects (2012, methodology): “This brings our research into accordance with other studies in this field (e.g., Aarøe, 2011; Gross, 2008).”
- Beyond Cognitive Framing Processes: Anger Mediates the Effects of Responsibility Framing on the Preference for Punitive Measures (2015, methodology): “Gross (2008) presented an experiment’s participants with an article arguing against mandatory minimum sentences for drug offenses.”
- No Harm in Checking: Using Factual Manipulation Checks to Assess Attentiveness in Experiments (2018, unknown): “19In another study we replicated (Gross 2008; see the supporting information), we again found only modest correlations between IMC and (1) FMC-TR (r = .22, p < .01), and (2) FMC-TI (r = .15, p < .05) passage rates.”
- Persuasion Through Emotion? An Experimental Test of the Emotion-Eliciting Nature of Populist Communication (2018, background): “Political communication is generally more persuasive when appeals are emotional rather than rational (Aarøe, 2011; Gross, 2008).”
- Investigating Frame Strength: The Case of Episodic and Thematic Frames (2011, methodology): “Within this general conceptualization of framing, episodic and thematic frames can be identified as two fundamental types of frames that appear across issues, time, and space in political news communication (Gross, 2008, p. 171; Iyengar, 1991, p. 2; de Vreese et al., 2001, p. 109).”
- The Mediating Role of Emotions (2015, background): “Using a 7-point scale (1 = not at all to 7 = very much ) and in accordance with previous studies (e.g., Gross, 2008), we measured the extent to which an individual felt the specific emotion in reference to the issue at stake (“To what extent did you feel one or more of the following emotions while…”
- Understanding the power of the picture: the effect of image content on emotional and political responses to terrorism (2014, unknown): “Similarly, empirical work has demonstrated that (manipulated or measured) appraisals can elicit distinct emotions (e.g., Gross, 2008; Halperin, 2011; Iyer, Leach, & Crosby, 2003; Iyer, Schmader, & Lickel, 2007).”
- Emotion, Emotion Regulation, and Conflict Resolution (2014, background): “The event may be framed by the mass media or by the leaders in a certain way, and this framing influences individuals’ appraisal of the event (Gross, 2008).”