The Digital Privacy Paradox: Small Money, Small Costs, Small Talk

208 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Privacy as a Public Good: A Case for Electronic Cash (2019, background): “Our paper connects to the so-called privacy paradox, which refers to the mismatch between stated preferences for privacy and actual behaviour to preserve privacy (Norberg et al., 2007; Athey et al., 2017).”
Designing Central Bank Digital Currencies (2019, background): “For empirical work measuring preferences for anonymity and the potential demand for CBDC, see Athey et al. (2017), Borgonovo et al. (2018) and Masciandaro (2018).”
Too Much Data: Prices and Inefficiencies in Data Markets (2019, unknown): “, “Why your inbox is crammed full of privacy policies”, WIRED, May 24, 2018 and Athey et al. [2017]).”
Some simple economics of the blockchain (2016, background): “viding citizens with central bank money;(8,36,43) alternative payment systems;5,42 implications for regulation and governance;(16,26,49,50) and the privacy trade-offs cryptocurrencies and digital wallets introduce for consumers.(2) From a business perspective, schol-”
Secrets and Likes: The Drive for Privacy and the Difficulty of Achieving It in the Digital Age (2020, background): “, 2013), and choosing to give up personal data in exchange for small convenience and small rewards (Athey et al., 2017).”
Central bank cryptocurrencies (2017, background): “Athey et al (2017) look at how much effort people make to protect their privacy in relation to digital currencies.”