Fractals and Statistics: An R Package Called IFS
By S. Iacus, Davide La Torre. 2003
4,193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Condensed Matter Physics, Economics and Econometrics, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Condensed Matter Physics
- Edgar C. Merkle
- Henrik Brøseth
- Andrew D. Martin
- J. Gaillard
- Wesley Bertoli
- V. Gómez‐Rubio
- J. Lahoz‐Monfort
- G. Guillera‐Arroita
In Economics and Econometrics
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Andrea Riebler
- Håvard Rue
- Sigrunn Holbek Sørbye
- Johannes B Reitsma
- G. Guillera‐Arroita
- Karel G. M. Moons
- Edgar C. Merkle
In Mathematical Physics
- Paul-Christian Burkner
- Aki Vehtari
- Andrew Gelman
- Bob Carpenter
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Matthew D. Hoffman
- Michael Betancourt
- Lawrence M. Murray
In Statistics and Probability
- Paul-Christian Burkner
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Aki Vehtari
- Andrew Gelman
- Håvard Rue
- Andrea Riebler
- Hongseok Yang
- Bob Carpenter
Citations in the corpus
- An Introduction to Probabilistic Programming (2018, background): “, 2018), STAN (Stan Development Team, 2014), JAGS (Plummer, 2003), BUGS (Spiegelhalter et al.”
- The No-U-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (2011, background): “The need to tune Lmakes it especially challenging to increase the scalability of general-purpose inference engines such as BUGS [5], JAGS [6], or Infer.”
- Automatic Differentiation Variational Inference (2016, neutral): “, 1995), JAGS (Plummer, 2003), and Stan (Stan Development Team, 2016).”
- Stan: A Probabilistic Programming Language (2017, background): “Compared to BUGS and JAGS , Stan is often relatively slow per iteration but relatively fast per effective sample.”
- Estimating Fisheries Reference Points from Catch and Resilience (2017, methodology): “The JAGS software (Plummer 2003) was used for sampling the probability distributions of the parameters with the Markov chain Monte Carlo method.”
- Definition and estimation of vital rates from repeated censuses: Choices, comparisons and bias corrections focusing on trees (2017, methodology): “Kohyama, Kohyama, and Sheil (2017) in the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.0722b provides a tutorial for estimating vital rates using JAGS via R (ver.”
- Biips: Software for Bayesian Inference with Interacting Particle Systems (2014, methodology): “Biips belongs to the BUGS language software family of WinBUGS , OpenBUGS (Lunn et al. 2000, 2012) and JAGS software (Plummer 2003).”
- Integrating demographic data: towards a framework for monitoring wildlife populations at large spatial scales (2014, methodology): “To explore and summarize the posterior distribution, we used the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm implemented in JAGS 3.3.0 called via the R package RJAGS 3.10 (Plummer 2003, 2013).”
- Dealing with false‐positive and false‐negative errors about species occurrence at multiple levels (2017, methodology): “Implementation of the model in programs such as BUGS or JAGS (Plummer 2003; Lunn et al. 2009) is in principle straightforward, but applying these general-purpose tools can potentially lead to the same inference problems discussed above (Appendix S6).”
- Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan (2019, methodology): “Similarly, blavaan can fit a subset of the models supported by lavaan using MCMCmethods implemented in JAGS (Plummer 2003) or Stan (Carpenter et al.”
- Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R (2nd Edition) (2018, methodology): “For instance, the JAGS software (Plummer 2003) for Bayesian inference is sometimes used (Wood 2016).”
- The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection (2014, methodology): “Models were fitted using Monte Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) techniques implemented in the software JAGS (Plummer, 2003) using three chains with a burn-in period of 10,000 samples, which were discarded, followed by 50,000 samples, thinned to retain every 25th sample, resulting in 2000 independent sample”