The pitfalls of ignoring behaviour when quantifying habitat selection

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Lessons from integrating behaviour and resource selection: activity‐specific responses of African wild dogs to roads (2016, background): “…and space use in multiple taxa including elk Cervus elaphus (Fryxell et al., 2008), killer whales Orcinus orca (Ashe, Noren & Williams, 2010), Bluefin tuna Thunnus maccoyii (Pedersen et al., 2011), lions Panthera leo (Elliot et al., 2014) and elephants Loxodonta africana (Roever et al., 2014).”
Scale of inference: on the sensitivity of habitat models for wide‐ranging marine predators to the resolution of environmental data (2017, background): “Incorporating behavioural state information has been shown to be highly informative in identifying preferred environmental conditions under which animals perform certain activities (e.g. foraging, migration, reproduction; Bailey et al. 2009; Patterson et al. 2009; Roever et al. 2014; Bestley et al. ”