The Relationship Between Masculinity Ideology, Condom Attitudes, and Condom Use Stage of Change: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

129 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development (2003, background): “Condom stage of change had only one indicator; see Noar and Morokoff (2002) for staging items.”
Breasts Are for Men: Media, Masculinity Ideologies, and Men’s Beliefs About Women’s Bodies (2006, background): “…of emotional intimacy with their current partners, greater belief that the relationships between men and women are adversarial, less consistent use of condoms, and more negative condom attitudes (Noar & Morokoff, 2002; Pleck et al., 1993a; Shearer, Hosterman, Gillen, & Lefkowitz, 2005; Sinn, 1997).”
Condom Negotiation in Heterosexually Active Men and Women: Development and Validation of a Condom Influence Strategy Questionnaire (2002, background): “Recent literature (Morokoff, 2000; Noar and Morokoff, 2002a) and the current study make a strong case for the importance of gender and gender roles as they relate to condom use and HIV prevention.”
The gender role strain paradigm and masculinity ideologies. (2016, unknown): “Using another measure of traditional masculinity ideology, the MRNS, Noar and Morokoff (2002) found that greater endorsement of traditional mas-culinity ideology was associated with more negative condom attitudes, and more negative condom Copyright Ame rican Psychological Association .”