Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions
By Sophie Bacq, Elisa Alt. 2018
398 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Business and International Management, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f2a653561f34020c8dbc62d7a51a20185c64c316
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Business and International Management
- Justin Paul
- Katrina M. Brownell
- Joel Adams
- Anil Kumar Bhat
- Preeti Tiwari
- Jyoti Tikoria
- Mahadeo Prasad Jaiswal
- Sumedha Chauhan
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Katrina M. Brownell
- Joel Adams
- Justin Paul
- Anil Kumar Bhat
- Preeti Tiwari
- Jyoti Tikoria
- Parul Gupta
- Sumedha Chauhan
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Katrina M. Brownell
- Joel Adams
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Sean Frederick
- Anil Kumar Bhat
- C. Bazan
- Simon Yap
- Hannah Gaultois
Citations in the corpus
- What Makes an Entrepreneurship Study Entrepreneurial? Toward A Unified Theory of Entrepreneurial Agency (2020, background): “More recently, this interest has manifested as research on the role of imaginativeness (Kier & McMullen, 2018; McMullen & Kier, 2017), fear (Cacciotti et al., 2016), or empathy (Bacq & Alt, 2018; McMullen, 2015) in entrepreneurship.”
- Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, neutral): “In addition, other characteristics typically associated with entrepreneurial orientation, such as self-efficacy (Bacq & Alt, 2018) but also perceived support (Mair & Noboa, 2006) and prior working experience with social organizations (Hockerts, 2017), are found to be important antecedents to…”
- Social entrepreneurship research: A review and future research agenda (2020, background): “A number of researchers have adopted a resource-based view and hybridity model to explain the hybrid nature of objectives and missions of SE (e.g. Bacq & Alt, 2018; Dwivedi & Weerawardena, 2018).”
- A systematic literature review of the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of social entrepreneurial intention of students (2020, methodology): “Bacq and Alt (2018) proposed that empathy explains SEI through two complementary mechanisms: self-efficacy (an agentic mechanism) and social worth (a communal mechanism).”
- Energizing through Visuals: How Social Entrepreneurs Use Emotion-Symbolic Work for Social Change (2019, neutral): “In the case of social entrepreneurship, compassion (Miller, Grimes, McMullen, & Vogus, 2012; Shepherd & Williams, 2014) and empathy (Bacq & Alt, 2018; Mair & Noboa, 2006) are significantmotivating feelings, althoughArend (2013) made the case for greater attention to drivers of emotions and the role…”
- Mediating Role of Prosocial Motivation in Predicting Social Entrepreneurial Intentions (2020, methodology): “…talked about how antecedents like empathy and moral judgement (Mair and Noboa 2006; Ernst 2011; Hockerts 2015, 2017; Tiwari, Bhat, and Tikoria 2017; Bacq and Alt 2018), social entrepreneurial education and self-efficacy (Ernst 2011; Hockerts 2015, 2017; Tiwari, Bhat, and Tikoria 2017) helpful in…”