Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental
By Gert Cornelissen, Mario Pandelaere, Luk Warlop, S. Dewitte. 2008
347 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f29be960d773fc3e08707bdaa8b0e15070952001
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- K. Lacasse
- L. Steg
- C. Klöckner
- K. Keizer
- E. van der Werff
- Andreas Nilsson
- John Th⊘gersen
- Wesley Schultz
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- K. Lacasse
- L. Steg
- C. Klöckner
- K. Keizer
- Andreas Nilsson
- E. van der Werff
- John Th⊘gersen
- H. B. Truelove
In Marketing
- L. Steg
- C. Klöckner
- K. Keizer
- John Th⊘gersen
- K. Grunert
- Andreas Nilsson
- E. van der Werff
- H. B. Truelove
Citations in the corpus
- Go Green! Should Environmental Messages be So Assertive? (2012, background): “Cornelissen et al. (2007) show that environmental compliance can be increased by cueing common environmentally responsible behaviors, presumably in part because compliance increases consumers’ perceived importance of such behaviors.”
- Consumer Well-Being: Effects of Subgoal Failures and Goal Importance (2014, background): “For example, Cornelissen et al. (2008) establish the value of positive communications about sustainable behaviors.”
- I Am What I Am, by Looking Past the Present (2012, methodology): “In line with previous research (Cornelissen et al., 2008), Study 4 showed that the manipulation of the salience of past behavior had an effect on proxies of environmental behavior.”
- Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda (2017, methodology): “In line with this reasoning, Thøgersen and Crompton (2009) conclude that spillover effects elicited by cognitive dissonance are unreliable.”
- The impact of moral identity on consumers’ green consumption tendency: The role of perceived responsibility for environmental damage (2018, background): “Subsequent research has also examined conditions and factors that facilitate or hinder green consumption, such as self-perception (Cornelissen et al., 2008), environmental behavior of other people (White et al.”
- Sustainability Labels on Food Products: Consumer Motivation, Understanding and Use (2014, background): “But it has also to do with the fact that weak attitudes affect behaviour only when primed in the behavioural sit- uation, a phenomenon addressed in the context of other forms of environmentally friendly behaviour (e.g., Cornelissen et al., 2008).”
- Saving electricity – For the money or the environment? Risks of limiting pro-environmental spillover when using monetary framing (2015, background): “In a study by Cornelissen et al. (2008) participants were cued with environmental behaviours.”
- For better or for worse? Empirical evidence of moral licensing in a behavioral energy conservation campaign (2013, background): “All three conditions apply to pro-environmental behaviors and the way environmental campaigns are perceived by the public (see Crompton and Kasser, 2009; Cornelissen et al., 2008; Thøgersen, 1999b).”
- Self-identity and internal environmental locus of control: Comparing their influences on green purchase intentions in high-context versus low-context cultures (2020, neutral): “Green behaviour has increasingly garnered attention in marketing research (Cornelissen et al., 2008; Sheth et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2018).”