The environmental state and the glass ceiling of transformation

By Daniel Hausknost. Environmental Politics, 2020

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

ABSTRACT What are the capacities of the state to facilitate a comprehensive sustainability transition? It is argued that structural barriers akin to an invisible ‘glass ceiling’ are inhibiting any such transformation. First, the structure of state imperatives does not allow for the addition of an independent sustainability imperative without major contradictions. Second, the imperative of legitimation is identified as a crucial component of the glass ceiling. A distinction is introduced between ‘lifeworld’ and ‘system’ sustainability, showing that the environmental state has created an environmentally sustainable lifeworld, which continues to be predicated on a fundamentally unsustainable reproductive system. While this ‘decoupling’ of lifeworld from system sustainability has alleviated legitimation pressure from the state, a transition to systemic sustainability will require deep changes in the lifeworld. This constitutes a renewed challenge for state legitimation. Some speculations regarding possible futures of the environmental state conclude the article.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c78a6fa1f250ec8a67791a4003f699c5bc44f682

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

  1. Dominik Wiedenhofer
  2. Angela Druckman
  3. Tim Jackson
  4. Daniel Hausknost
  5. Felix Creutzig
  6. H. Haberl
  7. F. Krausmann

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

  1. F. Krausmann
  2. Tim Jackson
  3. Dominik Wiedenhofer
  4. Angela Druckman
  5. H. Haberl
  6. Andreas Mayer
  7. Daniel Hausknost
  8. Felix Creutzig

Citations in the corpus