Explaining EU Activism and Impact in Global Climate Politics: Is the Union a Norm‐ or Interest‐Driven Actor?
By L. Schaik, Simon Schunz. 2012
122 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f20911aef7600c13611067a3aac00157ef501083
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
In Economics and Econometrics
In Political Science and International Relations
Citations in the corpus
- EU climate policy after the crisis (2014, background): “…at COP15, policy entrepreneurs (Schreurs and Tiberghien 2007, Costa 2008), public opinion (Lacasta et al. 2007, Oberthür and Dupont 2011), energy security (Oberthür and Kelly 2008, Vogler 2013), or EU norms of sustainability (Manners 2002, Lightfoot and Burchell 2005, Van Schaik and Schunz 2012).”
- From governance to government: The strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification (2016, methodology): “Following Gulbrandsen (2003) and van Schaik and Schunz (2012), we assumed actors’ behaviour to be rational and benefit-maximizing, rather than aimed at promoting a general goal, for example maintaining environmental sustainability.”
- Explaining goal achievement in international negotiations: the EU and the Paris Agreement on climate change (2018, background): “…saw a cautious recovery as the EU became a ‘leadiator’ (leader andmediator) securing the launch of negotiations in 2011 on what became the Paris Agreement (see generally Bäckstrand and Elgström 2013; Groen 2016; Groen and Niemann 2013; Oberthür 2011; van Schaik and Schunz 2012; Wurzel et al. 2017).”
- The EU's role in climate change negotiations: from leader to ‘leadiator’ (2013, methodology): “…only two years before, where the EU was described as having ‘discarded the leader’s yellow jersey’ (Dagens Nyheter 2008) and as having been totally marginalized in the final stages of the negotiation, leading to the Copenhagen Accord (Oberthür 2011; Parker et al. 2012; van Schaik and Schunz 2012).”