Trade Policy and Global Poverty
By W. Cline. 2004
233 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1e40adc2b6e3db734db2e345c823227537e2a9c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
Citations in the corpus
- Predicting the poverty impacts of trade reform (2004, background): “Several of the studies emphasize long-run growth as the primary vehicle for poverty reduction (Anderson et al., 2005; Cline, 2004; Dollar & Kraay, 2002; World Bank, 2004).”
- Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes. (2007, unknown): “There is great benefit to be had from increased trade openness, increasing interdependence among nations, and an expanded policy space at the global level to deal with the major issues – environment, health, security – common to all countries (Cline, 2004).”
- Channels and Policy Debate in the Globalization-Inequality-Poverty Nexus (2006, methodology): “According to the Stolper-Samuelson theorem as applied to the within-country inequality, developing countries well-endowed with unskilled labour should experience a decline in income inequality through an increased demand for unskilled labour, while unskilled labour in developed countries would lose ”
- Globalization and Rural Poverty (2006, methodology): “The annual loss to developing countries from agricultural tariffs and subsidies in rich countries is estimated from a static CGE model and the GATP trade and protection database by Cline (2004) to be about $45 billion (and much higher if dynamic effects are taken into account).”
- The Earnings Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Implications for Poverty in Developing Countries (2003, background): “, Cline, 2003). Thus the entire income distribution is assumed to shift in parallel, based on the predicted change in per capita income. To the extent that this equi-proportionate shift in income following trade liberalization is positive, it will likely lift some households above the poverty line, ”