Stochastic mapping of morphological characters.
By John P. Huelsenbeck, Rasmus Nielsen, Jonathan P. Bollback. Systematic Biology, 2003
883 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Paleontology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1e0d37091af6e91855bb3887488d0f064231531
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Genetics
- N. Matzke
- Liam J. Revell
- L. Garamszegi
- Richard H. Ree
- J. Hadfield
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond
- Pamela S. Soltis
In Molecular Biology
- Liam J. Revell
- Pamela S. Soltis
- D. Soltis
- Sergei L. Kosakovsky Pond
- Simon D. W. Frost
- Art F. Y. Poon
- Fraser Iain Lewis
- Richard E. Olmstead
In Paleontology
- N. Matzke
- Liam J. Revell
- Richard H. Ree
- L. Garamszegi
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- J. Hadfield
- Stephen A. Smith
- M. Crisp
Citations in the corpus
- Phylogeny and the Evolution of Floral Diversity in Pedicularis (Orobanchaceae) (2005, methodology): “…also provides estimates of the uncertainty (variance) associated with inferences of character evolution on a given phylogeny (Nielsen 2002) and, if applied to a set of candidate trees, can be used to make inferences while allowing for uncertainty in the phylogeny itself (Huelsenbeck et al. 2003).”
- Two new graphical methods for mapping trait evolution on phylogenies (2013, background): “1) in proportion to their probability conditioned on a model (Neilsen 2002; Huelsenbeck, Nielsen & Bollback 2003).”
- Evolutionary Perspectives on Seed Consumption and Dispersal by Fishes (2007, methodology): “We reconstructed the diet of ancestral nodes by applying stochastic likelihood methods for categorical data (Huelsenbeck et al. 2003), using the software package Mesquite (Maddison and Maddison 2006).”
- phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things) (2023, methodology): “1 Stochastic character mapping 119 Perhaps the most important and widely-used discrete character method of phytools is a technique referred 120 to as “stochastic character mapping” (Huelsenbeck et al. 2003).”
- Flammable biomes dominated by eucalypts originated at the Cretaceous-Palaeogene boundary. (2011, methodology): “The advantage of the Bayesian approach over parsimony and ML mapping is that uncertainty in parameters can be accommodated by using MCMC samples from their respective posterior distribution”
- General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology: phylogenies, taxonomies and multi‐trait models for continuous and categorical characters (2010, methodology): “…the relevant parameters also, using MCMC. Alternative methods exist, mainly based around models of substitutions in DNA sequences (Pagel, 1994; Huelsenbeck et al., 2003; Pagel & Meade, 2006), but Felsenstein (2005) gives a persuasive argument as to why the quantitative genetic approach is to…”
- Extended phylogeny of Aquilegia: the biogeographical and ecological patterns of two simultaneous but contrasting radiations (2010, methodology): “We applied the Bayesian mutational mapping approach (BMM) (Nielsen 2002; Huelsenbeck et al. 2003) for mapping the characters, using the post-burn-in tree file”
- Directional asymmetry of long‐distance dispersal and colonization could mislead reconstructions of biogeography (2005, neutral): “…inference has the advantage over both parsimony and ML methods of trait reconstruction of taking phylogenetic uncertainty, such as topology, parameter values, and branch length estimations, into account (Huelsenbeck & Bollback, 2001; Huelsenbeck et al., 2003; Pagel et al., 2004; Ronquist, 2004).”
- Bayesian estimation of the global biogeographical history of the Solanaceae (2017, methodology): “Stochastic mapping (Nielsen, 2002; Huelsenbeck et al., 2003) is a simulation approach that builds on likelihood models of trait evolution and, in addition to estimating ancestral states at nodes, provides possible histories of changes along branches.”
- Modern Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Their Application in Evolutionary Biology (2014, methodology): “The first plotting method for comparative data that I am going to describe is the relatively simple approach of visualizing the reconstructed history of a discretely valued character trait obtained from a phylogenetic method called stochastic character mapping (Nielsen 2002; Huelsenbeck et al. 2003)”
- An Evolutionary-Network Model Reveals Stratified Interactions in the V3 Loop of the HIV-1 Envelope (2007, methodology): “Phylogenetic methods based on ancestral reconstruction have been demonstrated to be robust to heterotachy [37] and variation in substitution rates across sites as well [51].”
- SIMMAP: Stochastic character mapping of discrete traits on phylogenies (2006, methodology): “In addition to implementing the above approach of stochastic posterior character mapping, SIMMAP also allows sampling from posterior predictive densities to evaluate the significance of hypotheses [16,23].”