Leakiness and creepiness in app space: perceptions of privacy and mobile app use
By Irina Shklovski, Scott D. Mainwaring, H. Skuladottir, Höskuldur Borgthorsson. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014
338 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a9b0e4481dfe588cf104baf7a8b7876dd94574d7
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Unaddressed privacy risks in accredited health and wellness apps: a cross-sectional systematic assessment (2015, background): “Users can struggle to accurately gauge privacy risks in general app stores [36, 37] and often report feeling un-comfortable about information sharing practices in otherwise valued apps [38].”
- The corporate cultivation of digital resignation (2019, background): “When applied to digital privacy, scholarly writing has pointed out that companies, including online advertisers, benefit from learned helplessness insofar as people tend not to dramatically alter their behaviors when they learn about unwelcome data practices (see Shklovski et al., 2014).”
- The privacy paradox - Investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior - A systematic literature review (2017, background): “…individuals tend to organize their use of mobile applications according to goal orientation, with users showing a higher susceptibility to accepting privacy and security intrusions (e.g. a banking app) when compared to less important applications (e.g. a gaming app) (Shklovski et al., 2014).”