Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: The Case of Islamic Banks
By Sayd Farook, Roman Lanis, Kabir M. Hassan. 2011
532 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Artificial Intelligence, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1b9a47e3317cf07b3636cb9edadd3a053984702
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Ahmed A. Elamer
- Hussein A. Abdou
- Collins G. Ntim
- Chris Pyke
- K. Hussainey
- A. Zalata
- Mohamed H. Elmagrhi
- Sherif El-Halaby
In Artificial Intelligence
- K. Hussainey
- A. Bukair
- A. Raman
- Sherif El-Halaby
- Azhar A. Rahman
- Hussein A. Abdou
- Collins G. Ntim
- Ahmed A. Elamer
In Strategy and Management
- Ahmed A. Elamer
- Hussein A. Abdou
- Collins G. Ntim
- K. Hussainey
- Chris Pyke
- A. Zalata
- A. Bukair
- A. Raman
Citations in the corpus
- The impact of multi-layer governance on bank risk disclosure in emerging markets: the case of Middle East and North Africa (2019, methodology): “In addition, a limited number of studies have examined the power of SSBs ’ to monitor banks ’ CG/ CSR disclosure and performance (Al-Bassam & Ntim, 2017; Farook et al., 2011; Grassa, 2016; Rahman & Bukair, 2013), as well as how country-level governance factors, such as the rule of law a ff ect risk…”
- The Influence of the Shariah Supervision Board on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure by Islamic Banks of Gulf Co-Operation Council Countries (2013, methodology): “Farook et al .”
- Corporate Governance, Islamic Governance and Earnings Management in Oman: A New Empirical Insights from a Behavioural Theoretical Framework (2017, unknown): “…of a limited number of studies suggest that IG mechanisms have a positive effect on: (i) CG practices (Safieddine, 2009); (ii) risk management practices (Ginena, 2014); (iii) CSR practices ( Farook et al., 2011; Rahman & Bukair, 2013 ); and (iv) financial performance (Mollah & Zaman, 2015).”
- Bank performance and board of directors attributes by Islamic banks (2015, methodology): “This study uses the same measurement that has been used by Farook et al. (2011).”
- Determinants of compliance with AAOIFI standards by Islamic banks (2016, methodology): “Our suggestion is consistent with a recent trend in the accounting literature (e.g., Farook et al., 2011; Abdul Rahman and Bukair, 2013) for research to look more deeply at the SSB characteristics of corporate governance.”
- Islamic Governance, National Governance, and Bank Risk Management and Disclosure in MENA Countries (2017, methodology): “an Islamic viewpoint and sourced Islamic governance quality variables used in those studies (AbuTapanjeh, 2009; AI-Bassam & Ntim., 2017; Elghuweel et al., 2017; Farook et al., 2011; Rahman & Bukair., 2013; Safieddine, 2009).”
- Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants (2019, methodology): “The findings established by this study show that political and socio-economic factors (HDI, PCR and MUSLIMRA-TIO) as determinants of environmental external influence are found to be most significant in their potential impact on the maqasid performance of IBs, which indicates that the application of ”
- Sharia supervisory boards, governance structures and operational risk disclosures: Evidence from Islamic banks in MENA countries (2020, methodology): “We rely on several proxies to capture SSB quality based on closely related studies (e.g., Abdullah et al., 2015; Farook et al., 2011; IFSB, 2005; Mallin et al., 2014; Rahman & Bukair, 2013).”