The Monopolization Hypothesis and the dispersal–gene flow paradox in aquatic organisms

By L. De Meester, A. Gómez, B. Okamura, K. Schwenk. 2002

790 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f1a213abbac4f212974664ff278c6bfc8684f1cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

How do freshwater organisms cross the “dry ocean”? A review on passive dispersal and colonization processes with a special focus on temporary ponds (2015, background): “The apparent conflict based on the empirical evidences of the absence of a significant gene flow among geographically close and conspecific populations of organisms which have the potential for long-range passive dispersal is known as the ‘‘dispersal – gene flow paradox’’ (De Meester et al., 2002).”
Application of an inexpensive and high‐throughput genomic DNA extraction method for the molecular ecology of zooplanktonic diapausing eggs (2008, background): “…copepods, ostracods, etc.) have yielded valuable insights into the evolutionary forces shaping their genetic structure and microevolution (De Meester et al. 2002; Gómez 2005; Ishida and Taylor 2007), and are helping to characterize the cryptic biodiversity of these groups (Gómez et al.…”
Any way the wind blows ‐ frequent wind dispersal drives species sorting in ephemeral aquatic communities (2008, background): “Louette and De Meester (2005) have shown that”
Mitochondrial DNA variation and cryptic speciation within the free-living marine nematode Pellioditis marina (2005, background): “Monopolization of resources and local adaptation (which may be prominent in P. marina; Moens & Vincx 2000a,b) can then produce persistent genetic structure over small spatial scales in the face of significant gene flow (De Meester et al. 2002).”
A taxonomic reappraisal of the European Daphnia longispina complex (Crustacea, Cladocera, Anomopoda) (2008, background): “…reproductive barriers or restricted gene flow among the morphs; local processes limiting the gene flow among populations, such as local adaptation and strong monopolization of resources (De Meester et al. 2002), seem to be more important in shaping the observed pattern of genetic variation.”
Looking beyond the mountain: Dispersal barriers in a changing world (2016, background): “For instance, dispersal barriers include oceans for terrestrial species (Holt et al. 2013; Burrows et al. 2014) but can also be caused by high densities of conspecifics limiting immigration (De Meester et al. 2002).”
Dormancy and dispersal as mediators of zooplankton population and community dynamics along a hydrological disturbance gradient in inland temporary pools (2017, background): “In new habitats, for example, first founders may exert persistent effects through the build-up of an egg bank and largely determine the genetic structure of the population (Boileau et al., 1992; De Meester et al., 2002; Gómez et al., 2002; Thielsch et al., 2015).”
Climatic control of dispersal–ecological specialization trade‐offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? (2010, background): “…ecological opportunism may be mediated either by genotypes supporting flexible adaptation to different conditions or by genetic versatility (diversity) of populations, and priority effects may play an important role in such systems (partly mediated by genetic versatility; De Meester et al., 2002).”
Diversity and endemism in Rotifera: a review, and Keratella Bory de St Vincent (2008, background): “Similarly, the presence of a large propagule bank of locally adapted genotypes may present an effective barrier against newly arriving genotypes (De Meester et al. 2002).”