Moving on: Institutionalism in Economic Geography

By A. Amin. 2001

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f18822aede0f7d4930c3ef7195d7b8ff60b579b3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Rethinking the Port (2006, background): “…to be premised in network relations alone: rather, it requires the insertion of power asymmetries to explain how and why networks and partnerships take placeöa point finding increasingly strong echoes in economic geography circles (Amin, 2001; Bathelt and Taylor, 2002; Jessop, 2001; Yeung, 2002).”
Toward a `New' Strategic Leadership of Place for the Knowledge-based Economy (2009, background): “;) and institution building (Amin, 1999; 2001; Amin and Thrift, 1995; Cooke & Morgan, 1995).”
Advancing Evolutionary Economic Geography by Engaged Pluralism (2014, background): “Recently GERTLER (2010) called for a revised IEG because, as he argues, despite a few attempts to bring institutions into the realm of economic geography (AMIN, 2001; MARTIN, 2000) this area has been relatively neglected.”
Dilemmas of Local Governance under the Development Zone Fever in China: A Case Study of the Suzhou Region (2008, background): “…in shaping the trajectories of economic development in different localities, thereby becoming important elements of further institutional variance (Amin, 1999, 2001; Amin and Thrift, 1995; Cumbers et al., 2003; Hayter, 2004; Jessop, 2001; MacLeod, 1998a; Martin, 2000; Martin and Sunley, 2006).”
Rethinking relational economic geography (2005, background): “This relational view of power has also been emphasized in the recent ‘institutional turn’ in economic geography (Amin 2001; Jessop 2001).”
Resources in Economic Geography: From Substantive Concepts towards a Relational Perspective (2005, background): “On the contrary, the productive and innovative use of resources depends upon the combination of adequate resources, the competencies of a firm, its mental model, the existing market conditions, and the socioinstitutional context.”
Exploring evolutionary economic geographies (2007, background): “Institutions may be interpreted ‘as containers of socioeconomic organisation, and [. . .] as processes of institutionalization of socioeconomic practices’ (Amin, 2001, 1237).”
Theorizing practice in economic geography: Foundations, challenges, and possibilities (2011, unknown): “Characterized by some as part of human geography’s cultural, institutional, or relational “turns” (Crang, 1997; Amin and Thrift, 2000; Amin, 2001; Bathelt and Glückler, 2003; Yeung, 2005a), scholars with a wide range of empirical and theoretical interests have considered or studied how socio-spatial”
Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies (2011, background): “Consequently, this paper continues the `institutional turn' (Jessop, 2004, page 23) that directs our attention not only towards hard and soft institutions (Gertler and Wolfe, 2004) but also towards self-reflexive individuals (Amin, 2001).”
Relational Economic Geography: A Partial Understanding or a New Paradigm? (2008, background): “Much of the focus of relational work is on how microscale social networks are performed and sustained (Murphy 2006), and it is argued that they are constantly changing, thereby shifting interests and identities (Amin 2001; Yeung 2003).”