Feature Indeterminacy and Feature Resolution.

206 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis (2002, methodology): “Like many other theorists, we treat 'inclusive' forms as the conjunction of a Speaker and an Addressee feature (see, for example, Dalrymple and Kaplan 2000:784).”
First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables (2004, background): “…not be treated as atomic, but should be decomposed in terms of the more basic notions ‘‘speaker’’ and ‘‘addressee’’ (see Zwicky 1977, and more recently Dalrymple and Kaplan 2000 and Harley and Ritter 2002 for related proposals, motivated respectively by the resolution of the person feature in…”
Lexical Functional Grammar (2001, unknown): “For example, Dalrymple & Kaplan (2000) argue for a set-based representation of the PERS and GEND features to allow for an account of feature resolution in coordination, and of the CASE feature to allow for case indeterminacy.”
Agreement: Terms and Boundaries (2003, background): “1 For evidence of the topic’s continuing challenge to core linguistics we may refer to recent papers such as Dalrymple and Kaplan (2000) and Wechsler and Zlatiç (2000).”
Determiner agreement and noun conjunction (2004, background): “For more discussion of PERSON and GENDER resolution in coordination, see Sadler (1999, 2003), Dalrymple & Kaplan (2000), Vincent & Börjars (2000), Wechsler (2002), and the references cited there.”