Person and Number in Pronouns: A Feature-Geometric Analysis
By Heidi Harley, E. Ritter. 2002
820 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Gender Studies, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7346ee02a580c43ec67fd6a6ab9363c9dac3b638
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Gender Studies
- Lauren Ackerman
- Corrine McCarthy
- Gillian Ramchand
- Maria Polinsky
- Peter Svenonius
- Hotze Rullman
- Greville Corbett
- Donna Lardiere
In Language and Linguistics
- Greville Corbett
- S. Hwang
- Gregory Scontras
- Donna Lardiere
- Maria Polinsky
- Lauren Ackerman
- Corrine McCarthy
- Gillian Ramchand
Citations in the corpus
- Plural-marking in L2 Korean: A feature-based approach (2013, background): “…those that are derivationally most complex, that is embedded most deeply in the feature hierarchy shown in Figure 1, will be acquired latest (for similar suggestions, see e.g. Harley and Ritter, 2002: 498; Hawkins and Casillas, 2008; Lardiere, 2000: 122–124, 2009: 215; McCarthy, 2008, 2012).”
- Understanding heritage languages (2019, background): “Studies of feature geometry aim to determine the structural organization and hierarchical relationships in agreement systems (Harley & Ritter, 2002; Ritter, 1993).”
- Ergative case and the transitive subject: a view from Nez Perce (2010, background): “…case marker: [3sg-T], [+participant-v] Phonology: /n1m/ Here [+participant] may be taken as a feature that subsumes 1st and 2nd person, as in Harley and Ritter (2002); or (86) may be taken as an abbreviation for two vocabulary items, one in terms of a referential feature [1st] and one in…”
- First and Second Person Pronouns as Bound Variables (2004, background): “…but should be decomposed in terms of the more basic notions ‘‘speaker’’ and ‘‘addressee’’ (see Zwicky 1977, and more recently Dalrymple and Kaplan 2000 and Harley and Ritter 2002 for related proposals, motivated respectively by the resolution of the person feature in conjoined NPs and by…”
- Syntactic and cognitive issues in investigating gendered coreference (2019, background): “(e.g., Ritter 1993; Comrie 1999; Schriefers & Jescheniak 1999; Harley & Ritter 2002; Kratzer 2009) Conceptual gender: The gender that is expressed, inferred, and used by a perceiver to classify a referent (typically human, but can be extended to anthropomorphized nonhumans).”