Long term growth responses of loblolly pine to optimal nutrient and water resource availability

By T. Albaugh, H. L. Allen, P. Dougherty, K. Johnsen. 2004

289 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Mechanical Engineering, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0cf1a312165080eab2f13e61e530a060b0e6961

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Mechanical Engineering

D. Forrester

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Explaining growth of individual trees: Light interception and efficiency of light use by Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil (2010, background): “Albaugh et al. (2004) showed that improved nutrition of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) was associated with higher stem growth per unit leaf area, indicating likely increases in LUE with increased rates of resource use. Will et al. (2001) found that differences in APAR accounted for most of the variatio”
Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: Why patterns differ for trees and stands (2013, background): “For example, irrigation and fertilization of loblolly pine increased leaf area index, light absorption, and basal area growth (Sampson and Allen, 1998; Albaugh et al., 2004); the increase in growth matched the increase in leaf area index, showing constant leaf area efficiency.”
Fertilization and irrigation effects on tree level aboveground net primary production, light interception and light use efficiency in a loblolly pine plantation (2013, background): “silviculture) develop when stands have high leaf area, high light absorption, and particularly high rates of stem growth per unit of light absorption (Albaugh et al., 2004; Binkley et al., 2004; Pangle et al., 2009).”
Twenty-Five Years of Intensive Forest Management with Southern Pines: Important Lessons Learned (2010, background): “Elsewhere within the region, including deep well-drained sands, nutrient limitations have been shown to have a stronger influence on forest productivity than water availability (Albaugh et al. 2004, Samuelson et al. 2004, 2008; Allen et al. 2005).”