Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: A comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students

By Vivi Alatas, Lisa A. Cameron, Ananish Chaudhuri, Nisvan Erkal, Lata Gangadharan. 2009

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Demography, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f0c051d2eb6303abdc71d388691a56773ef074ad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Demography

In Safety Research

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Propensities to engage in and punish corrupt behavior: Experimental evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore (2009, background): “Alatas et al. (2008) takes a step in this direction by comparing the behaviour of students and public servants in Indonesia.”
The effects of externalities and framing on bribery in a petty corruption experiment (2009, background): “And returning to bribery, while framing was not a treatment in the study, it is notable that Alatas et al. (2009) found significant differences in the behavior of students and public officials when each were engaged in the same bribery experiment framed as an exchange between a firm and a public o”
Dishonesty and Selection into Public Service: Evidence from India (2017, background): “This helps reconcile our findings with other work, such as Alatas et al. (2009), which finds no power of explicit measures of corruption in predicting job choices between the public and private sector.”
LEGAL CORRUPTION: LEGAL CORRUPTION (2011, unknown): “Alatas et al. (2009), Barr et al. (2009), and Cameron et al. (2009) provide comparative studies of similar bribery games for different country and occupation samples.”
The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List (2011, background): “, Alatas et al. [2009]; Belot, Duch, and Miller [2010]; Anderson et al. [2010] and see Frechette [this volume] on general subject pool differences). In fact, there is very little evidence that volunteer subjects are systematically different than nonvolunteers on traits or behaviors. LL report [LL, 2”
Letting the Briber Go Free: An Experiment on Mitigating Harassment Bribes (2013, unknown): “Also, male subjects seem to ask for more bribes than female subjects, a finding consistent with previous experimental findings (Alatas et al. 2009; Frank, Lambsdorff and 19 In our specification we included controls for religion (Hindu or non-Hindu), as well as interaction terms of the religion…”