The 'cultural turn' in Australian regional economic development discourse: neoliberalising creativity?

By Chrissie Gibson, Natascha Klocker. 2005

142 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Creative Small Cities: Rethinking the Creative Economy in Place (2009, background): “…easier said than done; increasingly, critical research questions are being asked about the appropriateness of creative city indexing methodologies (Gibson and Klocker, 2005; Christophers, 2007) and the replicability and transferability of normative policy discourses framed around creative…”
Cultural economy planning in creative cities: Discourse and practice (2013, background): “…2009; Ponzini and Rossi, 2010; Zimmerman, 2008), Europe (Bayliss 2007; Romein and Trip, 2009; Vanolo, 2008), Australia (Atkinson and Easthope, 2009; Gibson and Klocker, 2005), and Asia (Kong and O’Conner, 2009; Sasaki, 2010) is overwhelmingly critical of creative city policies for exacerbating…”
Include Us Out—Economic Development and Social Policy in the Creative Industries (2006, background): “Creativity fitted the bill not just because, as Gibson and Klocker (2005) say, it spoke to the liberated individual, but also because it spoke to the ‘new collective’.”