Posttraumatic Growth: Three Explanatory Models

By R. Janoff-Bulman. 2016

291 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f090dbaaaa9f3b0ba79426381281ee0979107bdf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. S. Hamby
2. Eric L. Garland
3. John H. Grych
4. Philippe R. Goldin
5. N. Farb
6. Barbara L. Fredrickson
7. Victoria L. Banyard
8. Arnold B. Bakker

Citations in the corpus

• The Mindfulness-to-Meaning Theory: Extensions, Applications, and Challenges at the Attention–Appraisal–Emotion Interface (2015, background): “Insofar as trauma leads to a shattering of assumptive worlds (Janoff-Bulman, 2004), coping with trauma involves rebuilding assumptive worlds via personally meaningful cognitive reappraisals that can accommodate the traumatic event into one’s schemas and life narrative.”
• The resilience portfolio model: Understanding healthy adaptation in victims of violence. (2015, background): “For example, PTG has been conceptualized both as a process for coping with trauma and as an outcome of the coping process (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004; Zoellner & Maercker, 2006), and there is inconsistency in the extent to which growth is viewed as a cognitive, emotional, or behavioral phenomenon (e.g”