Surface roughness model in machining hardened steel with cubic boron nitride cutting tool

By Y. Şahin, A. Motorcu. 2008

136 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanical Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f035ce7e6bfab408cb8844b85e5c395134b7deea

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

1. Tarek Mabrouki
2. Jean François Rigal
3. Y. Şahin
4. Khaider Bouacha
5. M. Yallese
6. E. Turkes
7. Suleyman Neseli
8. Süleyman Yaldiz

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Tarek Mabrouki
2. M. Yallese
3. Jean François Rigal
4. Y. Şahin
5. Khaider Bouacha

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Tarek Mabrouki
2. M. Yallese
3. Jean François Rigal
4. Y. Şahin
5. Khaider Bouacha
6. E. Turkes
7. Suleyman Neseli
8. Süleyman Yaldiz

Citations in the corpus

• Comparison of tool life between ceramic and cubic boron nitride (CBN) cutting tools when machining hardened steels (2009, methodology): “…or surface roughness prediction models have been reported by the Taguchi design or other methods (Cheng and Hong, 2003; Davim, 2001; Davim and Figueira, 2006; Kơpac et al., 2002; Sahin, 2006; Sahin et al., 2004; Sahin and Motorcu, 2008; Yang et al.1998; Ozel and Nadgir, 2002; Ozel and Karpat.2005).”
• Statistical analysis of surface roughness and cutting forces using response surface methodology in hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel with CBN tool (2010, background): “Other authors [15] have developed the surface roughness model based on the response surface methodology (RSM).”
• Optimization of tool geometry parameters for turning operations based on the response surface methodology (2011, background): “Another study [11,10] developed the surface roughness model based on the RSM.”