Entrepreneurs and the Ordering of Institutional Reform: Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia and Ukraine Compared

By Simon Johnson, J. Mcmillan, Christopher Woodruff. 2000

255 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f024471f21fa8929e1d78ab00e7d03c9c4704ea9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Searching for the existence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: a regional cross-section growth regression approach (2017, background): “This may attract more talented entrepreneurs to the region (or country) to start their own business (see, e.g., Johnson et al. 1999; Sobel 2008).”
The challenge of poor governance and corruption (2005, background): “…vary in the security of property rights, and countries with more secure property rights have higher levels of new investment by established firms (Johnson, McMillan, and Woodruff 2002, 2000).7 The security of property rights is measured by the ability of the state to enforce its own rules…”
Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start-ups in a developing country (2008, background): “…the latter given that it is most often associated with ‘entrepreneurial capital’ (Audretsch and Keilbach 2004) and that start-up firms are the ones most likely to grow (Johnson et al. 2000, Lingelbach et al. 2005) and to create new jobs (McMillan and Woodruff 2002: 166, Audretsch et al. 2006: 25).”
Government and entrepreneurship in transition economies: the case of small firms in business services in Ukraine (2010, background): “For example, Johnson et al. (2000) showed that Ukrainian managers in smaller firms spent a quarter of their time dealing with government and official regulations, while more than 90% of Ukrainian companies surveyed claimed to have made unofficial payments when registering their firms.”
Entrepreneurship and structural economic transformation (2008, background): “Other research indeed suggests that start-up firms are the ones most likely to grow (Lingelbach et al. 2005; Johnson et al. 2000) and to create new jobs (Audretsch et al. 2006: 25; McMillan and Woodruff 2002: 166).”
The Central Role of Entrepreneurs in Transition Economies (2002, unknown): “In Poland and in Russia, de novo manufacturing rms grew faster, invested at a higher rate and generated faster employment growth than did privatized rms (Belka et al., 1995; Richter and Schaffer, 1996; Johnson, McMillan and Woodruff, 2000).”
Which Institutions Encourage Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations (2013, background): “…Acemoglu and Johnson (2005), propose that these features of the constitution are especially important for entrepreneurs who need to rely on the security of their residual claims for the returns from the organisations that they have created (see also Johnson et al., 1999, 2000; Desai et al., 2003).”
Institutional factors, opportunity entrepreneurship and economic growth: Panel data evidence (2016, background): “…2003), other authors suggest that governance factors perceived by society could encourage or discourage the business dynamics in which entrepreneurship is involved (Djankov et al., 2005, 2006; Johnson et al., 1999; Johnson et al., 2000a; McMillan and Woodruff, 1999, 2002; van Stel et al., 2007).”
Objectives and Constraints of Entrepreneurs: Evidence from Small and Medium Size Enterprises in Russia and Bulgaria (2003, unknown): “Our results, based on intensity or imputed cost of constrain hence different than those of Johnson et al. (2000, 2002) based on the presence or of the phenomena.”
Explaining China's Low Consumption: The Neglected Role of Household Income (2007, unknown): “Johnson, McMillan, and Woodruff (2000) use survey data to examine new firms in Poland, Slovakia, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine and find that insecure property rights is most important in inhibiting job growth.”