Creating a new discipline of memory studies

By H. Roediger III, James V. Wertsch. 2008

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f020334bb448720feede1a395c3380fada5d107a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Agnes Delahaye
2. Stephen Procter
3. C. Booth
4. P. Clark
5. M. Rowlinson

Citations in the corpus

• Social Remembering and Organizational Memory (2010, background): “Typologies of memory continue to proliferate, especially in psychology (Roediger and Wertsch 2008: 10), but science has established a widely accepted taxonomical distinction between at least three classes of memory (Rose 2008: 56).”
• Collective future thought: Concept, function, and implications for collective memory studies (2016, unknown): “In their outline and suggestions for the burgeoning field of memory studies, Roediger and Wertsch (2008) call for a variety of activities necessary to truly make the field interdisciplinary.”