Integrating Findings from Research Reviews

By James McGuire. 2008

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The impact of skills in probation work: A reconviction study (2014, background): “The difference in reconviction outcomes is marked, and greater than many treatment effects reported for programmes (McGuire, 2002).”
Is treatment non-completion associated with increased reconviction over no treatment? (2007, background): “Since meta-analyses of offender treatments indicate that cognitive behavioural treatments are most effective in reducing recidivism (McGuire, 2002), we focused on cognitive behavioural interventions, excluding other types of intervention, such as therapeutic communities, restorative justice, family…”
Risk and need assessment in British probation: the contribution of LSI-R (2007, background): “…programmes of supervision at higher risk levels is now amply attested by a number of systematic reviews (see, for example, Andrews et al., 1990; McGuire, 2002), but the situation at lower risk levels is not always so clear, and many recipients of community sentences are at these lower levels.”
A review of the factors that can influence the effectiveness of sexual offender treatment: Risk, need, responsivity, and process issues (2007, background): “These suggestions are consistent with the literature surrounding ‘what works’ in the treatment of offenders (McGuire, 2002) and the principles of risk/need/responsivity (Andrews & Bonta, 2003) and can be implemented within a more positive framework for 623 L.”