Technological revolutions and financial capital : the dynamics of bubbles and golden ages

By C. Pérez. 2003

1,251 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f018d538cd4c367118372846d7394ea632b994e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Deep transitions: Emergence, acceleration, stabilization and directionality (2018, positive): “The Techno-economic Paradigm framework (TEP) (Perez, 1983; Freeman and Perez, 1988; Tylecote, 1992; Podobnik, 1999; Freeman and Louçã, 2001; Perez, 2002; Dewick et al., 2004; Drechsler et al., 2009; Mathews, 2013, 2014) has generally focused on explaining long waves: 40–60 year long cyclical variati”
The Politics of Sustainability and Development (2016, background): “Sustainability transformations are increasingly being understood in relation to long-range processes of change, including technological innovation and finance (182), as well as wider historical political economy processes (see also 183).”
Integrated marketing communications: From media channels to digital connectivity (2009, background): “In her book, Technological revolutions and financial capital, Carlota Perez (2002) describes how technological revolutions progress through four stages – interruption, frenzy, synergy and maturity – all stages closely tied to the allocation of financial capital.”
PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AS AN INDUSTRIAL POLICY TOOL: AN OPTION FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIES? (2010, background): “(See, e.g., Arthur, 1994; Perez, 2002) These characteristics engender long-term structural changes in the economies in form of technology trajectories, paradigms and geographical agglomerations.”
From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy (2016, background): “While significant attention has been devoted to the role of large agencies or institutions (such as DARPA or the NIH) in historical mission-oriented projects, it is only recently that considerable focus has been placed on the broader network of structures, actors, strategies and agencies, such as in”
Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience (2006, methodology): “The model is linked to the analysis of technological revolutions (Freeman and Perez, 1988; Perez, 2002) and to the analysis of high-tech cluster development (Bresnahan et al.”
Innovation and international business (2017, background): “…wider dispersion of innovative effort in ICT is one facet of the paradigm shift in the general conditions for innovation and growth, according to the neo-Schumpeterian perspective upon long-run techno-socio-economic change (Freeman 1987; Freeman and Perez 1988; Freeman and Louça 2001; Perez 2002).”
The impact of the economic crisis on innovation: Evidence from Europe (2013, background): “This might be interpreted as the result of a decline of technological opportunities in established sectors which is typical during recessions characterized by technological discontinuities [15].”
Creativity Economy and a Crisis of the Economy? Coevolution of Knowledge, Innovation, and Creativity, and of the Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Society (2012, result): “Moreover, the number of innovations increased over time, and the diffusion of innovations overlapped, thus complicating the identification of such spikes, also complicating the dating of “the waves” in economic or innovation activities, further complicating correlation attempts [ 49 ].”
Urban Competitiveness and Public Procurement for Innovation (2011, background): “…competitiveness is also based on the crisis of the mass production paradigm beginning in the 1970s and the emerging problems of industrial cities (in Europe as well as in North America) in the 1980s (Savitch and Kantor, 2002, for a comparative overview; Perez, 2002, on techno-economic paradigms).”