Foraging partitioning between giant petrels Macronectes spp. and its relationship with breeding population changes at Bird Island, South Georgia

By J. González‐Solís, J. Croxall, A. G. Wood. 2000

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/f002e1a61e1dc9224b8b78c693727451a8d085d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Oceanographic habitats of two sympatric North Pacific albatrosses during the breeding season (2002, methodology): “We employed kernel estimation techniques to delineate the foraging ranges and the core habitat areas used by both albatross species and genders during the brooding and rearing periods (Prince et al. 1999, Gonzalez-Solis et al. 2000, Wood et al. 2000).”
Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review (2009, background): “Similarly, as habitat use may vary inter-annually (Xavier et al. 2003, Pinaud et al. 2005), and between populations (González-Solis et al. 2000a, Grémillet et al. 2004, Rayner et al. 2008), potential plasticity in habitat preferences should be considered, and if possible incorporated into analyses…”
Stable isotopes reveal trophic segregation by sex and age in the southern giant petrel in two different food webs (2005, background): “…higher isotopic values of females may be that they often visit waters above the Antarctic polar front for feeding, with a consequent increase in isotopic signatures, whereas the foraging areas of males are more restricted to the Antarctic waters around South Georgia (González-Solis et al. 2000a).”
Short-term effects of data-loggers on Cory’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) (2005, background): “…of the bird, are used to automatically record location and activity or to monitor environmental variables such as water temperature, salinity and sea currents (Wilson et al. 1995, 1997, 2002; Tuck et al. 1999; Garthe et al. 1999; González-Solis et al. 2000; Hamer et al. 2001; Hedd et al. 2001).”
Albatrosses and petrels in Australia: a review of their conservation and management (2002, background): “Species that have been studied are Southern Giant Petrel and Northern Giant-Petrel from South Georgia (González-Solís et al. 1999); Wandering Albatross from Iles Crozet (Jouventin and Weimerskirch 1990; Weimerskirch et al.”
Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics (2007, background): “This can occur over oceans too: Black-browed albatross Thalassarche melanophrys females over-winter several degrees further north and west than males (Phillips et al. 2005), as do female giant petrels (Gonzalez-Solis et al. 2000).”
A Statistical Assessment of the Status and Trends of Antarctic and Subantarctic Seabirds (2001, background): “…I, South Georgia, a survey in 1996 (DR Briggs & R Humpidge, unpubl. data) for comparison with similar surveys in each of the years 1979 to 1981 (Hunter 1984) revealed an estimated population of 521 pairs, 7% lower than the average of 558 pairs for the earlier period (González-Solís et al. 2000).”
Diet and trophic position of Leach's storm-petrel Oceanodroma leucorhoa during breeding and moult, inferred from stable isotope analysis of feathers (2006, background): “…species (e.g. wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans and giant petrels Macronectes spp.) substantial sex differences have been reported for both foraging location and the prey species selected for offspring provisioning (Weimerskirch et al. 1993, 1997, Gonzales-Solis et al. 2000, 2002).”