Effects of Experimental Forest Management on Density and Nesting Success of Bird Species in Missouri Ozark Forests
By W. Gram, Paul A. Porneluzi, R. Clawson, J. Faaborg, S. C. Richter. 2003
123 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eff61e34c99dd9cb4fd8edfdee7343a6eb8f4025
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Peter P. Marra
- Richard T. Holmes
- A. Anders
- Keith A. Hobson
- T. Sillett
- T. Sherry
- J. Faaborg
- Frank R. Thompson
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Richard T. Holmes
- Keith A. Hobson
- M. Ahlering
- JeriLynn Peck
- A. Anders
- Peter P. Marra
- J. Faaborg
- Eric K. Zenner
Citations in the corpus
- Recent advances in understanding migration systems of New World land birds (2010, background): “For example, agricultural landscapes supported more cowbirds and raccoons, to the detriment of birds attempting to breed in the remaining forests, than forested landscapes, even if some of the forest was in early stages of succession (Gram et al. 2003).”
- Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks (2006, result): “We find it likely that the widespread drought in southern Missouri throughout the late 1990s that may be responsible for these animal declines (Gram et al., 2003; Renken et al., 2004) could also be the cause for the reductions seen in this study.”
- AVIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT MEETS CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION: IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL THEY COME? (2006, methodology): “…three of the sites had trees removed by even-aged management (clearcu ing) over ∼10% of the area, three sites had an equivalent amount of timber removed by single-tree and group-selection cu ing over ∼70% of those areas, and three sites were treated as controls with no harvest (Gram et al. 2003).”