Responses of ground flora to a gradient of harvest intensity in the Missouri Ozarks
By Eric K. Zenner, John Kabrick, Randy G. Jensen, JeriLynn Peck, Jennifer Grabner. 2006
108 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efa5852e3d9438d727344ff469eda21ee3561b5b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Understory abundance, species diversity and functional attribute response to thinning in coniferous stands (2010, background): “Increased understory plant cover and diversity after thinning at the DMS sites agreed with responses detected for temperate forests (McConnell andSmith, 1970; Thysell and Carey, 2001; Wienk et al., 2004; Metlen and Fiedler, 2006; Zenner et al., 2006; Dodson et al., 2008), although most of those stud”
- Canopy effects on vegetation caused by harvesting and regeneration treatments (2010, background): “In their work on the effects of harvest intensity on ground flora of upland mixed oak forests, Zenner et al. (2006) found a clear gradient in species richness and ground cover 3–4 years after cuttings with increasing harvest intensity, with the highest values in clearcuts.”