Plot shape effects on plant species diversity measurements

By J. E. Keeley, C. Fotheringham. 2005

63 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geometry and Topology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eff32f0aa1cc2c922ff2ebdc1bd1d4e8ca4c8b72

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geometry and Topology

1. E. Tjørve
2. Jürgen Dengler
3. F. S. Gilliam

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Tjørve
2. Jürgen Dengler
3. F. S. Gilliam

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. Jürgen Dengler
2. E. Tjørve
3. F. S. Gilliam
4. K. A. Triantis
5. Robert J. Whittaker
6. Benjamin M. Bolker
7. Thomas Koellner
8. Thomas Wohlgemuth

Citations in the corpus

• The Ecological Significance of the Herbaceous Layer in Temperate Forest Ecosystems (2007, methodology): “Variations of this approach using a square or rectangular shape—and with subplot size as small as 0.01 m2 (Peet et al. 1998)—are frequently found in the literature (Peet et al. 1998, Keeley and Fotheringham 2005).”
• A flexible multi-scale approach for standardised recording of plant species richness patterns (2009, background): “5– 5% more species in 4:1 rectangles) and may not be significant (Keeley and Fotheringham, 2005; for review, see Dengler, 2008).”
• Shapes and functions of species–area curves (II): a review of new models and parameterizations (2009, background): “Also, sampling design affects curve shape (Hill et al., 1994; Keeley & Fotheringham, 2005; Ulrich & Buszko, 2007).”