Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behaviour: review with new data

By J. Reilly, V. Penpraze, J. Hislop, G. Davies, S. Grant, James Y. Paton. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2008

614 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efc721207fe687419f482a21dce6323c314d6f2e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Mark S. Allen
2. S. Howard
3. Davina A. Robson

In Physiology

1. P. Katzmarzyk
2. Ulf Ekelund
3. Mark S. Tremblay
4. Nick Wareham
5. R. Steele
6. Ian Janssen
7. K. Corder
8. Søren Brage

Citations in the corpus

• Assessment of physical activity in youth. (2008, background): “Accelerometers vary in size and cost and their use in youth has been described in detail elsewhere (28, 84, 91).”
• Self-regulation in childhood as a predictor of future outcomes: A meta-analytic review. (2020, background): “For example, body mass index and physical activity levels can be assessed using self-report but can also be assessed using objective measures such as researcher calculated height and weight (for BMI) and pedometers or accelerometers for physical activity levels (see e.g., Reilly et al., 2008).”
• Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth. (2016, background): “…be due to the historical focus on MVPA (Tremblay et al. 2010a; Marshall and Ramirez 2011) and the widespread use of subjective assessments of PA (Reilly et al. 2008; Adamo et al. 2009; Janssen and LeBlanc 2010; Trost et al. 2011), which cannot accurately capture LPA (e.g., various incidental…”