Dispersion of displaying male sage grouse
By J. Bradbury, R. Gibson, C. McCarthy, S. Vehrencamp. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2004
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/efb67e112e20f670fa835a6c5b5b706d4804055f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology
- G. White
- Michael A. Schroeder
- J. Connelly
- Brett L. Walker
- David E. Naugle
- M. Efford
- Rachel M. Fewster
Citations in the corpus
- Characteristics and Dynamics of Greater Sage-Grouse Populations (2011, background): “Female attendance tends to be relatively synchronous, peaking in mid- to late March in Washington (Schroeder 1997), late March to early April in California (Bradbury et al. 1989) and Oregon (Hanf et al. 1994), and early to midApril in Alberta (Aldridge and Brigham 2001), Colorado (Petersen 1980, Wal”
- Factors Affecting Nest Survival of Greater Sage-Grouse in Northcentral Montana (2007, unknown): “…research has focused on leks and bird behavior at leks (e.g., Wallestad et al. 1975, Gibson et al. 1990, Wakkinen et al. 1992, Gibson 1996), seasonal habitat use (Eng and Schladweiler 1972), and seasonal movements and dispersal (Dunn and Braun 1985; Connelly et al. 1988; Bradbury et al. 1989a, b).”
- Evaluation of the lek-count index for greater sage-grouse (2004, background): “…low attendance rates are troubling from a sampling and population dynamics perspective and may be the cause of major daily variations and fluctuations in high counts at a particular lek site (Hartzler 1972, Jenni and Hartzler 1978, Beck and Braun 1980, Emmons and Braun 1984, Bradbury et al. 1989).”