Evaluation of the lek-count index for greater sage-grouse

By D. Walsh, G. White, T. Remington, D. C. Bowden. 2004

95 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/005f21b25874ba6cd0f969af426a72c180abf997

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Douglas H. Johnson
2. Sarah P. Saunders
3. Elise F. Zipkin
4. M. Winter

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Sarah P. Saunders
2. Elise F. Zipkin

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Douglas H. Johnson
2. Sarah P. Saunders
3. Elise F. Zipkin

Citations in the corpus

• In Defense of Indices: The Case of Bird Surveys (2008, background): “A few studies with actual and simulated data suggested that boundedcount estimates were better than maximum counts but often remained inaccurate (Walsh et al. 2004, Johnson et al. 2007).”
• Synthesizing multiple data types for biological conservation using integrated population models (2018, background): “…information available for sage-grouse (Centrocercus minimus, C. urophasianus), a threatened species in the western United States; however, these data are minimally informative of vital rates and do not account for imperfect detection during sampling (Walsh et al., 2004; Kelling et al., 2015).”