Crowdfunding of Small Entrepreneurial Ventures

By Armin Schwienbacher, Benjamin Larralde. 2010

828 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef83bdf843ff83176aec95f9f7918d6e00938829

Citations in the corpus

• The formation and interplay of social capital in crowdfunded social ventures (2014, neutral): “Individually, all these are always relatively small compared to traditional investment forms, but can pile up to large amounts in sum (Lehner 2013; Schwienbacher and Larralde 2010). q 2014 Taylor & Francis *Email: othmar.lehner@sbs.ox.ac.uk Vol. 26, Nos.”
• Is the crowd sensitive to distance?—how investment decisions differ by investor type (2017, neutral): “The four primary types of crowdfunding models are donation-based, debt-based, equity-based, and rewardbased (Agrawal et al. 2011; Bradford 2012; Schwienbacher and Larralde 2012; Belleflamme et al. 2013, 2014; Burtch et al. 2013, 2014, 2015; Mollick 2014; Ahlers et al. 2015; Schweizer and Zhou 2016).”
• Does success bring success? The post-offering lives of equity-crowdfunded firms (2017, neutral): “Relatedly, Schwienbacher and Larralde (2010) argue that reward-based platforms are more likely to attract individuals who invest because they “enjoy” an initiative, whereas equity-based platforms attract people backing projects for a return on their investment.”
• Dynamics of Lending-Based Prosocial Crowdfunding: Using a Social Responsibility Lens (2018, neutral): “…to online fundraising accessible to the general public, and which in general, seeks to provide financial resources to specific entrepreneurial projects or causes (see Burkett 2011; Lin and Viswanathan 2015; Mollick 2014; see Schwienbacher and Larralde 2010 for other complementary definitions).”
• Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda (2013, neutral): “The challenges for equity-based CF are thus multi-faceted; they comprise legal and regulatory hurdles (Heminway and Hoffman 2011; Larralde and Schwienbacher 2012; Pope 2011; Rubinton 2011; Schwienbacher and Larralde 2010), as well as considerations about governance and control.”
• Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding (2016, neutral): “Online crowdfunding or crowd-sourcing means relying on the Internet to directly seek financial support from the general public (Belleflamme, Lambert, and Schwienbacher 2014; Geiger et al. 2011; Kleemann, voß, and Rieder 2008; Lambert and Schwienbacher 2010; Mollick 2014; Schwienbacher and Larralde 2”
• From the crowd to the market: The role of reward-based crowdfunding performance in attracting professional investors (2017, neutral): “Interestingly, crowdfunding projects can vary substantially in both goal and magnitude, ranging from small artistic projects to new entrepreneurial initiatives seeking hundreds of thousands of dollars in seed capital (Schwienbacher and Larralde, 2012).”
• Individual crowdfunding practices (2013, neutral): “In their case analysis of an equity-based individually crowdfunded start-up, Schwienbacher and Larralde (2012) also stressed the need for building a community of crowdfunders which enjoys additional utility from their participation.”
• Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding (2015, neutral): “…paper has examined signaling in the context of equity crowdfunding (although for related work on crowd financing, see Agrawal, Catalini, & Goldfarb, 2011; Burtch, Ghose, & Wattal, 2013; Colombo, Franzoni, & Rossi-Lamastra, 2014; Cumming & Johan, 2013; Mollick, 2014; Schwienbacher & Larralde, 2010).”
• Crowdfunding for renewable and sustainable energy projects: An exploratory case study approach (2016, neutral): “It is “an open call, essentially through the Internet, for the provision of financial resources either in the form of donation or in exchange for some forms of reward and/or voting rights in order to support initiatives for specific purposes” [6].”