DNA-based methods for monitoring invasive species: a review and prospectus

By J. Darling, M. Blum. Biological Invasions, 2007

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef77a50bca5228354d62e7df08bafdd26139f2d4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Molecular Biology

Citations in the corpus

Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing (2012, methodology): “1; following Darling & Blum (2007)]. using the DNA barcoding approach (Fig.”
Ecotoxicogenomics: Emerging Technologies for Emerging Contaminants 1 (2009, background): “Several papers have addressed the use of genomics for detecting adenovirus (Jiang, 2006), specific bacteria strains using 16S rRNA (Pontes et al., 2007), pathogens using environmental arrays (Heinemann et al., 2006), and invasive species (Darling and Blum, 2007).”
The accuracy of scat identification in distribution surveys: American mink, Neovison vison, in the northern highlands of Scotland (2010, background): “It is possible to improve the accuracy of distribution data through systematic surveys and now, due to developments in genetic analysis techniques, through DNA identification of field signs (e.g. Darling and Blum 2007).”
Applications of next-generation sequencing to the study of biological invasions (2015, background): “It is therefore well-established that genetics offer versatile tools to investigate the fundamentals of biological invasions (Lee, 2002; Darling and Blum, 2007; Weinig et al., 2007; Le Roux and Wieczorek, 2009; Fitzpatrick et al., 2012).”
Use of DNA barcoding to detect invertebrate invasive species from diapausing eggs (2011, background): “The advantages of DNA barcoding are that it allows for identification of species when morphological identification may offer only estimates of higher taxonomic levels or no estimate at all (Darling and Blum 2007), it recognizes cryptogenic species (Bickford et al.”
Introduction and use of non‐native species for aquaculture in China: status, risks and management solutions (2015, methodology): “In addition, it should be noted that the impending benefits of DNA/RNA-based methods are vast, and worthy of continued effort and investment (Darling & Blum 2007; Darling & Mahon 2011).”
Environmental DNA monitoring and management of invasive fish: comparison of eDNA and fyke netting (2017, methodology): “The advantages of DNA-based detection, such as sensitivity, ease of sample collection, and ability to discern species presence regardless of size or life stage, makes it a useful detection tool (Darling and Blum 2007; Dejean et al. 2012).”
Molecular genetic tools for environmental monitoring of New Zealand's aquatic habitats, past, present and the future (2013, background): “Early detection of invasive species has in the past been problematic because morphological identification of the various life-history stages of different marine organisms cannot be easily determined (Darling & Blum 2007).”