Molecular genetic tools for environmental monitoring of New Zealand's aquatic habitats, past, present and the future

By S. Wood, Kirsty F. Smith, J. Banks, L. Tremblay, L. Rhodes, D. Mountfort, Stephen C. Cary, Xavier Pochon. 2013

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a709ad9042a84a5c40a9fdf6248a9f865a41dd5a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. N. Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta
2. Á. Borja
3. Eva Aylagas
4. Xabier Irigoien
5. I. Muxika

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. N. Rodríguez‐Ezpeleta
2. Á. Borja
3. Eva Aylagas
4. Xabier Irigoien

Citations in the corpus

• New Zealand pest management: current and future challenges (2015, methodology): “Within waterways, techniques such as environmental DNA sampling, as mentioned above, can improve aquatic monitoring and surveillance, although further research is needed to improve the efficacy of such methods (Wood et al. 2013).”
• Benchmarking DNA Metabarcoding for Biodiversity-Based Monitoring and Assessment (2016, background): “Nevertheless, biomonitoring based upon benthic organisms has limitations because species identification requires extensive taxonomic expertise and it is time-consuming, expensive, and laborious (Yu et al., 2012; Wood et al., 2013; Aylagas et al., 2014).”