Globalisation: the great unbundling(s)
By Richard E. Baldwin. 2006
411 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef39be7b39170b6155f9c44ee13a21a26b0d763d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- M. Timmer
- B. Los
- G. D. de Vries
- E. Dietzenbacher
- Pol Antràs
- Robert C. Johnson
- Robert Stehrer
- Guillermo Noguera
Citations in the corpus
- Output Upstreamness and Input Downstreamness of Industries/Countries in World Production (2017, unknown): “The literature focusing on trade in intermediates is by now quite large and is rapidly growing (see e.g., Jones and Kierzkowski, 1990; Hummels et al., 2001; Antr`as et al., 2006; Baldwin, 2006; Koopman et al., 2011; Johnson and Noguera, 2012; Timmer et al., 2012).”
- Trade openness and international fragmentation of production in the European Union: the new divide? (2012, unknown): “Baldwin (2006) argues that the actual globalisation process occurs at the level of the firms, which can fragment their production stages and/or delocalise tasks because of lower communication and coordination costs.”
- The Emergence of China and India as New Competitors in MNCs' Innovation Networks (2009, background): “Vertical industry specialisation and the possibilities of an ever-finer ‘slicing’ or ‘unbundling’ (Baldwin 2006) of value chains have increased the opportunities for outsourcing and offshoring of services.”
- Fragmentation, Incomes and Jobs: An Analysis of European Competitiveness (2013, unknown): “But globalisation has entered a new phase in which international competition increasingly plays out at the level of activities within industries, rather than at the level of whole industries, dubbed the “second unbundling” by Baldwin (2006) (see also Feenstra 1998, 2010).”
- HOW GLOBAL ARE GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS? A NEW APPROACH TO MEASURE INTERNATIONAL FRAGMENTATION (2015, background): “, Sinn, 2006; Baldwin and Evenett, 2012). Another dimension along which more insights can be gained is the increase of detail at the subnational level. Cherubini and Los (2013) and Dietzenbacher, Guilhoto, and Imori (2013) have pioneered regional disaggregation of the Italian and Brazilian parts of ”
- Outward FDI and Local Employment Growth in Italy (2008, background): “On a theoretical basis, there are a host of channels that could link home labour markets and FDI (see, for instance, the discussion in Baldwin (2006)).”
- A Portrait of Trade in Value-Added over Four Decades (2017, background): “To date, this literature has focused on assembling data and measuring trade in value added in the cross-section, or for the post-1995 period [Daudin, Rifflart, and Schweisguth (2011), Johnson and Noguera (2012a), Timmer (2012), Erumban, Los, Stehrer, and Timmer (2013), Among other possible determina”
- THE CONSTRUCTION OF WORLD INPUT–OUTPUT TABLES IN THE WIOD PROJECT (2013, background): “Recently, economic theory has also paid attention to the causes and consequences of this process which Baldwin (2006) refers to as the ‘second wave of unbundling’.”
- Is it (Still) Mostly Fiscal? Determinants of Sovereign Spreads in Emerging Markets (2008, background): “The literature has attributed the tightening of emerging market spreads to three factors: (i) sound macroeconomic policies that brought inflation under control (including through more independent monetary authorities), reduced output volatility, and significant reductions in public and external debt”
- Gravity Chains: Estimating Bilateral Trade Flows When Parts and Components Trade is Important (2011, unknown): “When the standard controls are included, see column (4), the base case estimate is 0.4 to which must be added the period coefficients which are 0.3 for the pre-Factory Asia period (Baldwin 2006), 0.2 for the 1987- 1996 period, and essentially zero (and insignificant) for the post 1998 period.”
- Organizations and Trade (2009, methodology): “The e¤ect of unbundling the production process, as labeled by Baldwin (2006), has been compared to the e¤ect of improvements in technology.”