An Issue of Permanence: Assessing the Effectiveness of Temporary Carbon Storage

By H. Herzog, K. Caldeira, J. Reilly. 2002

216 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Finance, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ef37ac26f2c32e033ab866381421a1a5e79983f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Reyer Gerlagh
2. Bob van der Zwaan
3. B. Sohngen
4. B. Murray
5. E. Papyrakis
6. David Popp
7. Shuai Shao
8. Lili Yang

In Finance

1. Reyer Gerlagh
2. Bob van der Zwaan

In Global and Planetary Change

1. B. Sohngen
2. Reyer Gerlagh
3. Bob van der Zwaan

Citations in the corpus

• Economic consequences of consideration of permanence, leakage and additionality for soil carbon sequestration projects (2007, background): “Second, some authors ( Herzog et al. 2003; Keeler 2005) have suggested that permanence discounts for carbon sinks could actually be 100% (i.e., temporary carbon has no value) under the conditions of GHG prices rising at the discount rate and credits that expire completely at the end of the project.”
• Inter-trading permanent emissions credits and rented temporary carbon emissions offsets: some issues and alternatives (2003, background): “We note thatHerzog et al. (2003) approach the permanence of carbon sequestration with the vision that even emissions reductions do not represent a permanent change in the cumulative flux of CO 2 to the atmosphere.”
• Climate Strategy with Co2 Capture from the Air (2006, unknown): “Because the impacts are expressed as a function of CO 2 concentrations they implicitly include uncertainty in the climate’s response to radiative forcing as well as uncertainty in climate change impacts.”
• Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter (2007, unknown): “Such beliefs grossly overestimate current models of natural uptake and potential rates of carbon capture and sequestration (Herzog et al., 2003; Chisholm, et al., 2001; Buesseler and Boyd, 2003, Jean-Baptiste and Ducroux, 2003; Buesseler et al., 2004; Scott et al., 2004).”
• Economics of geological CO2 storage and leakage (2009, background): “1, rather than the time-independent version adopted in Herzog et al. (2003).”