A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving

By J. Scott, R. Gray. Hum. Factors, 2008

361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eef475976c7c4787403a32f6571624e1f6b19c5d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

1. Alexander Eriksson
2. Neville A Stanton

In Social Psychology

1. Alexander Eriksson
2. Neville A Stanton
3. Mark S. Young

Citations in the corpus

• Autonomous driving: investigating the feasibility of car-driver handover assistance (2015, neutral): “[4, 9, 14]).”
• Takeover Time in Highly Automated Vehicles: Noncritical Transitions to and From Manual Control (2017, result): “No haptic feedback was included in this study, despite the findings from Petermeijer, de Winter, and Bengler (2016) and Scott and Gray (2008) showing shorter reaction times when vibrotactile feedback was used.”
• Crossmodal spatial attention (2010, neutral): “69 80”