Light absorption and light-use efficiency in mixtures of Abies alba and Picea abies along a productivity gradient
By D. Forrester, Axel Tim Albrecht. 2014
115 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/eee6c703289aa32f4bd1b83175a42d3fabbee283
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe (2018, methodology): “However, mixing effects on APAR have rarely been quantified (Binkley, Dunkin, DeBell, & Ryan, 1992; Forrester & Albrecht, 2014; Forrester, Lancaster, Collopy, Warren, & Tausz, 2012; Le Maire et al., 2013; Sapijanskas, Paquette, Potvin, Kunert, & Loreau, 2014).”
- Characterization of the structure, dynamics, and productivity of mixed-species stands: review and perspectives (2015, methodology): “In accordance with this approach, Forrester and Albrecht (2014) and Groot et al. (2014) quantified light capture by individuals of each species to study productivity in mixed stands.”
- Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests (2015, background): “As competition for light lessens, trees allocate a greater portion of fixed carbon towards the development of lateral branches and less towards vertical growth (Vieilledent et al. 2010; Seidel et al. 2011a; Forrester & Albrecht 2014).”
- Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships – developing functions for mixed‐species forests (2017, background): “…in some cases the predicted variable can differ by more than 100%, for a given diameter (Getzin & Wiegand 2007; Laclau et al. 2008; Thorpe et al. 2010; Bayer, Seifert & Pretzsch 2013; Metz et al. 2013; Barbeito, Collet & Ningre 2014; Forrester & Albrecht 2014; Jucker et al. 2014; Pretzsch 2014).”
- Improved productivity and modified tree morphology of mixed versus pure stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) with increasing precipitation and age (2016, background): “on better sites and resulted in a higher yield with improving site conditions (Forrester et al. 2013; Forrester and Albrecht 2014).”
- Tree‐to‐tree competition in mixed European beech–Scots pine forests has different impacts on growth and water‐use efficiency depending on site conditions (2018, background): “Similarly, light absorption and light- use efficiency in mixtures have been shown to increase as climatic conditions improved (Forrester & Albrecht, 2014).”
- Tamm Review: On the strength of evidence when comparing ecosystem functions of mixtures with monocultures (2015, methodology): “, 2013), light absorption (Forrester and Albrecht, 2014) and transpiration (Forrester, 2015).”