Crown plasticity enables trees to optimize canopy packing in mixed-species forests
By Tommaso Jucker, Olivier Bouriaud, David A. Coomes. 2015
416 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Insect Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e6ec54c1fc2b5eefd03b0d4d33add030e6ac534f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- Eric K. Zenner
- F. Valladares
- M. A. Zavala
- U. Niinemets
- Richard A. Fournier
- Lauri Laanisto
- S. Robert
- Martin-Ducup Olivier
In Insect Science
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- F. Valladares
- M. A. Zavala
- Eric K. Zenner
- U. Niinemets
- Lauri Laanisto
- Richard A. Fournier
- S. Robert
- Martin-Ducup Olivier
Citations in the corpus
- Response of sugar maple (Acer saccharum, Marsh.) tree crown structure to competition in pure versus mixed stands (2016, result): “These results are also compatible with several studies showing the importance of tree crown plasticity in response to neighborhood species (Jucker et al., 2015; Lintunen and Kaitaniemi, 2010; Pretzsch, 2014; Thorpe et al., 2010).”
- Is Tree Species Diversity or Species Identity the More Important Driver of Soil Carbon Stocks, C/N Ratio, and pH? (2016, background): “Aboveground productivity as well as basal area in the studied plots 351 were unaffected by diversity (Jucker et al., 2014; Jucker et al., 2015), so we expect litterfall would have been 352 unchanged along the diversity gradient.”
- Toward managing mixed-species stands: from parametrization to prescription (2017, background): “Given complementarity of morphological and physiological traits, the canopy space of mixed species stands can be much more densely packed than in monocultures (Jucker et al. 2015, Pretzsch 2014).”
- Shedding light on shade: ecological perspectives of understorey plant life (2016, background): “Vegetation dynamics and succession in many communities is primarily driven by interspecific differences in resource uptake and stress tolerance, with light frequently being a key resource (Canham et al. 1994; Jucker et al. 2015; Zhang et al. 2015).”
- Above‐ground biomass is driven by mass‐ratio effects and stand structural attributes in a temperate deciduous forest (2018, background): “Vertically stratified and densely packed canopies intercept more light and exhibit enhanced productivity (Jucker et al., 2015).”